百科问答小站 logo
百科问答小站 font logo



「中国有 13 亿人,他们越崛起,我们就会越没饭吃…」 是奥巴马说的吗?是直译还是意译? 第1页

  

user avatar   yang-ce 网友的相关建议: 
      

关于这段话,可以参考在下面问题中,知友

@崔子同

的回答。

含英文原文以及视频连接。

并且,在评论中还有对英文翻译的讨论

为什么西方部分发达国家不能接受中国的崛起?

题主描述的话,部分是真实的,部分不可考。


user avatar   cao-feng-ze-37 网友的相关建议: 
      

不是原话。原话比这句话更不要脸,更不要脸一万倍。

原话指的是,如果中国人的能耗与美国人一样了,那么世界是承受不起的。

这句话已经成为了名言,在环境系,土木系,经管学院的各个老师嘴里说了无数遍。每次听到,只有苦笑。

谁让我们积贫积弱呢。我们黄种人是劣等民族,我们先天低人一等,我们不配过白大人一样的生活。我们节能,我们减排,供白大人挥霍淫乐,天经地义。

在我们打败他们之前,我们低人一等。

KERRY O’BRIEN: YOU’VE DESCRIBED NUCLEAR TERRORISM AS AMERICA’S GREATEST RISK IN THE SHORT AND LONG TERM, BUT CLIMATE CHANGE HAS ALSO BEEN DESCRIBED AS THE GREATEST SINGLE RISK TO HUMANITY. YOU MET CHINESE PRESIDENT HU ON MONDAY. DID YOU TWO MAKE ANY PROGRESS ON CLIMATE CHANGE, BECAUSE SURELY THE SOLUTION IS LARGELY IN THE END IN YOUR HANDS AND HIS? PRESIDENT OBAMA: Well you know I think China has an enormous interest in solving this problem. You know if you talk to Chinese leaders I think they will acknowledge immediately that if over a billion Chinese citizens have the same living patterns as Australians and Americans do right now then all of us are in for a very miserable time, the planet just can’t sustain it, so they understand that they’ve got to make a decision about a new model that is more sustainable that allows them to pursue the economic growth that they’re pursuing while at the same time dealing with these environmental consequences. So I think they understand intellectually. Right now though they’re understandable impulse is to say well let’s let the developed countries, the Australias, and the Americas deal with this problem first and we’ll get to it when we’ve caught up a little bit in terms of our standard of living. The point we’ve tried to make is we can’t, we can’t allow China to wait. We have to take responsibility and do what needs to be done, but if emerging countries not just China but also India, Brazil and others are pursuing a path in which they replace us as the largest carbon emitters, that’s not a sustainable practical approach, so we’re going to have to have everybody moving on the same track at the same time.




  

相关话题

  如果一个人抗战时期加入了伪政权,然后用职权尽力阻止日军烧杀掠夺,这是爱国还是卖国? 
  为什么蒙古灭金用23年,灭西夏用21年,灭南宋却花费五六十年? 
  如何看待新闻「男子身穿日本军旗装登山,遭愤怒群众扒衣」? 
  如何看待俄方称乌克兰总统泽连斯基 25 日已经离开基辅,他从乌克兰首都发出的所有呼吁都是提前拍摄? 
  胡适在出任驻美大使期间的演讲,对影响美国民意,使之同情中国而厌恶日本,有多大作用? 
  如何看待洪秀柱访问大陆?她访问大陆有何诉求?对大陆来说是促统机遇吗? 
  如何看待前美国驻成都总领事的夫人庄祖宜回应「纳粹」等言论:是直率用词不会改,有自由抒发个人想法? 
  中国的行政组织结构是怎样的? 
  为什么说战略要学毛泽东,战术要学邓小平? 
  如何看待印度外交部长称「当务之急是通过外交途径与中国达成和解」? 

前一个讨论
英国衰落有哪些原因?
下一个讨论
为什么祖先坟墓里面的文物要属于国家?





© 2025-06-18 - tinynew.org. All Rights Reserved.
© 2025-06-18 - tinynew.org. 保留所有权利