百科问答小站 logo
百科问答小站 font logo



如何评价纽约时报“1619项目”获得2020年普利策奖? 第1页

  

user avatar   wang-shi-tao-42-22 网友的相关建议: 
      

我喜欢多元文化叙事,但多元文化真的不是这么玩的

「This approach goes far beyond the case for teaching African American Studies in colleges or making sure that black history is integrated in school curricula. Instead of asserting the need to add to traditional American history a fuller account of the black experience, the 1619 Project calls for replacing that traditional account with one that makes the black experience primary – and not just for black Americans, but for all Americans.

要不是因为触动了灯塔国的国本,1619项目属于根本不值得历史壬去认真回应的一场媒体狂欢,over

「The usual way for disputes about history to be resolved is for historians to present their best arguments, and their sources, in journal articles; each side can then examine the evidence for themselves and hammer out the truth. The 1619 Project evades this kind of transparency. The lead author, Nikole Hannah-Jones, who makes some of the most audacious claims, cites no sources at all: the project as presented in the magazine contains no footnotes, bibliography, or other scholarly footholds.

An ordinary reader would not expect such things in a Sunday newspaper, but the 1619 Project is not an ordinary piece of newspaper journalism. It is an attempt to wrest control of the grand narrative of American history. That really isn’t the proper role for a newspaper, which should report the news rather than attempt to create it. The Times stumbled badly by presenting unsourced and unsupported assertions as the writing of history. Much of the controversy that followed consisted of historians’ challenging the claims and the Times’ scrambling to find some plausible substantiating evidence.

I chose the title 1620 mainly as a riposte to the claim that the arrival of slaves in Virginia was the real founding of America. In November 1620, the passengers on the Mayflower drew up an agreement on how they would conduct their public affairs when they disembarked. That document, the Mayflower Compact, I argue – as have many others – pointed the way toward America’s self-government. It is the beginning of ordered liberty in the New World. That is the vantage point from which I survey the 1619 Project. America was never a “slavocracy.” It was and is humanity’s great attempt to create a society based on principles of freedom and equality.」


摘錄自

1620

Peter W. Wood

此內容可能受到著作權的保護。




  

相关话题

  苏德战争前,苏联趁德国入侵波兰,抢占波兰东部,是不是战略败笔? 
  邱吉尔的租借法案是维系了英国,还是饮鸩止渴,让英国彻底衰落? 
  如果穿越到明末李自成进京前的起义军一小兵,如何改变历史进程? 
  匈牙利为什么扯奥匈帝国的后腿,甚至想独立? 
  截止 2 月 5 日美国新冠死亡病例超 90 万,美国应采取哪些防疫措施? 
  东印度公司是不是世界历史上第一贩毒集团? 
  如何看待“印尼海军以军舰身份要求中国海警不得介入射击我渔船”? 
  美国通过租借法案援助盟国的物资,战后如何归还? 
  夏朝的说法是什么时候开始出现的? 
  卡斯特罗是独裁者还是伟大领袖? 

前一个讨论
如何评价神圣罗马帝国的斐迪南二世?
下一个讨论
英宗以后非进士不入翰林 非翰林不入内阁 有反例吗?





© 2025-05-27 - tinynew.org. All Rights Reserved.
© 2025-05-27 - tinynew.org. 保留所有权利