百科问答小站 logo
百科问答小站 font logo



如何评价纽约时报“1619项目”获得2020年普利策奖? 第1页

  

user avatar   wang-shi-tao-42-22 网友的相关建议: 
      

我喜欢多元文化叙事,但多元文化真的不是这么玩的

「This approach goes far beyond the case for teaching African American Studies in colleges or making sure that black history is integrated in school curricula. Instead of asserting the need to add to traditional American history a fuller account of the black experience, the 1619 Project calls for replacing that traditional account with one that makes the black experience primary – and not just for black Americans, but for all Americans.

要不是因为触动了灯塔国的国本,1619项目属于根本不值得历史壬去认真回应的一场媒体狂欢,over

「The usual way for disputes about history to be resolved is for historians to present their best arguments, and their sources, in journal articles; each side can then examine the evidence for themselves and hammer out the truth. The 1619 Project evades this kind of transparency. The lead author, Nikole Hannah-Jones, who makes some of the most audacious claims, cites no sources at all: the project as presented in the magazine contains no footnotes, bibliography, or other scholarly footholds.

An ordinary reader would not expect such things in a Sunday newspaper, but the 1619 Project is not an ordinary piece of newspaper journalism. It is an attempt to wrest control of the grand narrative of American history. That really isn’t the proper role for a newspaper, which should report the news rather than attempt to create it. The Times stumbled badly by presenting unsourced and unsupported assertions as the writing of history. Much of the controversy that followed consisted of historians’ challenging the claims and the Times’ scrambling to find some plausible substantiating evidence.

I chose the title 1620 mainly as a riposte to the claim that the arrival of slaves in Virginia was the real founding of America. In November 1620, the passengers on the Mayflower drew up an agreement on how they would conduct their public affairs when they disembarked. That document, the Mayflower Compact, I argue – as have many others – pointed the way toward America’s self-government. It is the beginning of ordered liberty in the New World. That is the vantage point from which I survey the 1619 Project. America was never a “slavocracy.” It was and is humanity’s great attempt to create a society based on principles of freedom and equality.」


摘錄自

1620

Peter W. Wood

此內容可能受到著作權的保護。




  

相关话题

  为啥说李世民没后裔? 
  西安和洛阳谁才是十三朝古都? 
  《三国演义》相比于四大名著中的其它三部,它是不是有很多的不足之处? 
  韩国这种美国“殖民地”,为什么要拥有自己的军队? 
  想问下是哪个典故,关于故意激化矛盾从而降低对方言辞可信度的,? 
  如何看待美国宣布制裁厦门市梧村派出所民警黄元雄? 
  截至当地16日,美国新冠死亡病例超3万例,特朗普预计美疫情死亡人数将低于预期,美国能如期控制住疫情吗? 
  美国人如何看待水门桥一战? 
  历史上是否真的有人假扮君主招摇撞骗? 
  都说世界在右转,那为何白左和政治正确在全球越来越嚣张跋扈? 

前一个讨论
如何评价神圣罗马帝国的斐迪南二世?
下一个讨论
英宗以后非进士不入翰林 非翰林不入内阁 有反例吗?





© 2025-06-17 - tinynew.org. All Rights Reserved.
© 2025-06-17 - tinynew.org. 保留所有权利