妈呀让我缓缓,这篇文章逗死我了
A Chinese tourist who tried to report a stolen wallet during a visit to Germany unwittingly signed an asylum application that got him stranded as a refugee for two weeks in the country's burgeoning asylum bureaucracy.
The well-dressed 31-year-old, known as Mr L, spoke only Mandarin. German authorities only discovered their mistake after turning in desperation to a local Chinese restaurant to interpret for them, a Red Cross official said on Monday.
"He didn't speak any German or English -- only Mandarin," Christoph Schluetermann, head of a Red Cross refugee centre in the northern town of Duelmen, told Reuters after the man from Beijing was released to resume his tour of Europe.
He spent 12 days trapped in our bureaucratic jungle because we couldn't communicate," he said. "Germany is unfortunately an extremely bureaucratic country. Especially during the refugee crisis I've seen how much red tape we have."
After being robbed in the tourist town of Heidelberg, the man went to city hall, which he thought was a police station, where he signed an asylum application. He was then taken 220 miles to a refugee shelter in Duelmen and given food and spending money like other refugees.
More than one million refugees have arrived in Germany in the last year, fleeing war and poverty in Syria, Iraq, Afghanistan and elsewhere. There has been only a tiny number of Chinese asylum-seekers over the years, Schluetermann said.
The man was fingerprinted and given a medical exam, but drew the attention of staff partly because he was well-dressed.
"But he (also) acted so differently to other refugees," said Schluetermann. "He kept trying to talk to people to tell his story but no one could understand him. He kept asking to get his passport back, which is the opposite of what most refugees do."
Red Cross staff tried to get translation help from online apps but only learned the truth when they finally turned to a local Chinese restaurant.
"It was an extraordinary moment for us all. He said Europe was not what he had expected," said Schluetermann, adding that the man was happy to leave but not upset.
"What would you expect if you had come to Europe as a tourist and spent 12 days sleeping on a camping bed in a refugee centre?"
Reuters
很多老玩家应该看过一个视频“史诗级猛犸”吧
那个视频大火之后很多主播也跟风玩出了很多“食屎级猛犸”
然而这位猛犸短短一个Ti期间的操作集锦已经可以做一个“史诗级猛犸2.0”
而且背景板里lgd的画面绝对不少
成王败寇论的话,你说了一大堆理由,那你赢了没嘛?你夺冠了没嘛???
理性的讨论
一 赵公子觉得猛犸养怪物,然而决赛几盘猛犸的经济跟敌方一号位起码是五五开,有时候甚至能达到六四七三开,不论是ts的猛犸还是lgd的猛犸。
人家绝活猛犸的对线能力就是强,你说潮汐马尔斯打某些近战c线上是比猛犸强,可是英雄的强弱不仅取决于英雄本身还有使用者实力的因素.事实就是没有养出怪物阿.
二 赵公子的意思是打推进节奏压制发育。
人家猛犸对线水平强,10分钟打把跳刀就基本成型了,20分钟吃工资都够个魔晶了.你打推进然后没啥控制,推塔被拱进去怎么救嘛?他的猛犸只要有了跳刀魔晶就是高配蝙蝠,还不怕林肯莲花的那种.
虽说有舍有得,猛犸失去的是对线能力,换来的是中期双大哥有buff的极速发育+10几秒一次的强先手+无视魔免的大团控.此外这个英雄基本万金油.虽然r式bp很蠢,但是这个猛犸确实很好地扮演了发动机的角色.
第三 赵公子自己去针对猛犸
无抬手的瞬发控制确实可以针对猛犸,拉比克的举,天怒的沉默,lion小y的变羊等等.第三局我一度觉得只靠他反制猛犸是不是有点走钢丝,一不小心没举到就没了.可是赵公子发挥的很好,甚至逼得这个猛犸出了个林肯.
可是没了拉比克之后,用天怒去反制容错率是不是太低了呢?
我不知道赵公子的回复评论的初衷是什么
可能只是想给真正热爱的dota玩家讲一遍当时他们的心路历程
表达我们的思路是这样的,只是没执行好
同时也希望能打消假赛论,打消傲慢论
但是也表明了一个态度
正如一个评论说的
再给lgd一次机会他们还是不会ban猛犸
对于决策者来说
一个优秀的计划
并不是执行起来精确到分毫的
而是执行相对轻松
容错率较高的
如果lgd五个人都是最好的状态
我相信你们可以打出自己想要的效果
(理想中的情况应该是注意走位不被拱进去
又或者是拱进去了对面也打不过
也可以是拱的一瞬间把他打断留在己方阵地)
如果不是开局0比2被对手掌握三个冠军点
你们可以大胆的去试错
可事实并不是这样
ame肉眼可见的不在状态
莫言除开那把tk也发挥的并不好
剩下的包括小明鞭也都是工具人
很难打出胜决第二把那种四转三毁天灭地大牛的效果
不论到底是几个人参与了bp
这是一个失败的决策
不论是从结果论还是逻辑上